Write on the literary and cinematic influences

Influences

Write on the literary and cinematic influences on the western films of Sam Peckinpah, Sydney Pollack ‘sJeremiah Johnsonand Tom Gries’Will Penny.

Some of the great managers in the Western genre of American film include Sam Peckinpah, Sydney Pollack, and Tom Gries. The critically and commercially successful movies they directed did non happen in a originative vacuity, nevertheless. Each owed a deep debt of gratitude in footings of influence by other creative persons – novelists, poets, and fellow film makers. Their work was besides profoundly tinged by the sociopolitical civilization within which they operated, and in the instance of Peckinpah, the timber of his personal life. Besides, the three work forces owed a debt of artistic gratitude to each other, as they shared certain thematic involvements, a desire to research the genre of the Western in a different manner than their predecessors. They besides borrowed freely both from each other and a similar common pool of cinematic and literary influences.

Sam Peckinpah

In the kingdom of literary influences, Peckinpah felt a affinity with Ernest Hemingway. Both were men’s work forces, for better or for worse, who lived difficult lives outside of their professional work. Both were thoughtful, sensitive, and observant creative persons who besides carried with them the paradoxical personality traits of being bloody-minded, scratchy substance maltreaters. Neither adult male was fond of the castrating societal via medias apparently required to acquire by in the 20Thursdaycentury, and it showed in their work. Like Hemingway, Peckinpah was thematically fascinated with rugged, archetypical work forces combating against castrating alterations in the universe around them, iconoclasts fighting with complicated, sometimes insolvable moral quandary set against tragic and/or violent backgrounds: “Just as Hemingway ‘s alleged ‘macho’ work forces were in fact flawed and ill equipped to last in a universe of stuff convenience and self aggrandisement, Peckinpah ‘s characters were largely Rebels, who refused a societal conformance that would rob them of their self-respect and their sense of justification.” ( Winter, 2000 ) Examples of such work forces in Peckinpah’s Western movies include Joel McCrea and Randolph Scott inRide the High State— tough, former cowpunchers reduced to self-parody in a going circus act ; Deke Thornton inThe Wild Bunch– one in a set of former criminals looking for one last large mark ; Sheriff Pat Garrett inPat Garrett& A ;Billy the Kid —a former criminal turned sheriff, who is tasked to kill his former spouse in offense. Another thematic captivation both work forces shared was with force, but non merely on a unidimensional degree of sadomasochistic savageness ; both work forces believed that in violent Acts of the Apostless, much beauty was to be found – an curiously romanticized fetishization, but sincere however. The violent content inThe Wild Bunchshocked and offended many motion-picture fans ( gaining Peckinpah the ill-famed moniker “Bloody Sam, ” but its force was non a gratuitous exercising ; instead, it was to exemplify the powerless so many work forces feel over the way in which their destiny takes them: “Just as we watch with awe as a king of beasts chases down and conquers a gazelle, so these criminals from a more violent clip invoke accomplishments which finally produce slaughter and death.” ( Winter, 2000 ) Like many of their characters, both Peckinpah and Hemingway met ill-timed deaths under take downing fortunes. Both work forces basically drank and/or drugged themselves to decease ; even though Hemingway committed suicide – he blew his ain caput off with a scattergun in July 1961 – it was simply a merchandise of the same internal devils that caused his alcohol addiction. Peckinpah overdosed on cocaine and ended up death of bosom failure after two pacesetters – a weak old adult male.

( It is deserving observing as a point of sarcasm that macho Peckinpah was a ardent protagonist and frequenter of a homosexual adult male whose work profoundly influenced Peckinpah — playwright Tennessee Williams. Peckinpah directed Williams’The Glass Menageriein six separate tallies. )

Though amazing in his originality and inherent aptitudes to force the boundaries narrative and cinematographical frontiers, Peckinpah besides owed a profound debt of gratitude to other film makers, both his equals and those who had preceded him including Akira Kurosawa and John Ford severally. Peckinpah did non even bother to hide his esteem for Kurosawa’s work, reportedly being quotation marks as stating “I want to do Westerns the manner Kurosawa makes Westerns.” ( Hagopian, 2001 ) . Kurosawa’sThe Seven Samurai( 1954 ) is non a Western, per Se, but is thematically related to Westerns in the sense of stating a narrative about a disappearing category of work forces – samurai warriors – whose codification of award were progressively at odds with a modernizing society. Kurosawa completed the circle of esteem by openly mentioning and arousing John Ford as an influence on his ain work, peculiarlyThe Seven Samurai. The movie does non simply evoke Ford’s sweeping filming, nevertheless – it is a cinematographical circuit de force all its ain, using a apparently effortless combination of ocular techniques – changing deepnesss of field, unusual points of position, different movie velocities, quick-cutting collage, to call a few. It is besides a instance survey in the find of beauty and poesy within the flowering of force and decease. For 1969’sThe Wild Bunch, Peckinpah modeled both narrative and ocular manner afterThe Seven Samurai.The film postings forThe Wild Bunchominously read “Unchanged work forces in a changing land. Out of measure, out of topographic point and urgently out of clip… Suddenly a new West had emerged. Suddenly it was sundown for nine work forces. Suddenly their twenty-four hours was over. Suddenly, the sky was bathed in blood… ” ( Dirks, 1996 ) , a description which non merely summed up the thematic compulsions which colored all of Peckinpah’s movies, but could easy hold been used to depictThe Seven Samurai. The similarities manifested themselves in ocular executing, every bit good. Not merely did Peckinpah borrow Kurosawa’s techniques in the ocular sphere forThe Wild Bunch, he expanded upon them gloriously:

Peckinpah borrowed that Kurosawa motive and blended it with the disconnected collage of Russian film makers like Sergei Eisenstein and Dziga Vertov ( which had been revived by the Gallic New Wave in Jean-Luc Godard ‘s leap cuts and the quick, subliminal redaction of Alain Resnais ‘ Last Year at Marienbad [ 1961 ] ) to make his signature redacting style… and to accomplish itThe Wild Bunchcontained more single cuts ( 3,642 ) than any other colour movie in history. ( Ramirez-Berg, 1999 )

Another Kurosawa movie that Peckinpah appreciated and which infused his ain work was 1950’sRashomon, which tells the narrative of the barbarous colza of a adult female and the slaying of her hubby, the turn being that the narrative is told from four different points of position, from the four suspects in the offense. This device, the relativity of truth depending on position, is besides found to some grade – coincidental? – within William Faulkner’s 1931 bookThe Sound and The Fury, another writer Peckinpah liked. In his ain work, Peckinpah actively explored, and every bit alluded to above, lived a life of contradictions where black and white bled into a continuum of Grey, and the Nipponese cultural inclination to ambiguity was a natural fountain of geographic expedition for Kurosawa.

Merely as Kurosawa was influenced by John Ford, so Peckinpah was besides. Ford virtually defined the genre of the modern Western, with his heroic poem filming and farinaceous work forces who follow codifications of award to the decease. One of Peckinpah’s favourite movies, in fact, was Ford’s 1956 chef-d’oeuvreThe Searchers,which tells the narrative of a burned-out Confederate war veteran who spends old ages runing for his niece, who was abducted by Comanches during a foray, merely to happen she has married the Comanche main – merely the kind of moral complexness Peckinpah loved and would viciously come in into the Western genre himself. John Wayne, in the lead function, was possibly the first true anti-hero in the Western genre and this served as a launching point for Peckinpah’s womb-to-tomb geographic expedition of the psychological science of the anti-hero faced with morally equivocal fortunes. Despite being the individual most responsible for exploding the conventions of the traditional Western, Peckinpah had huge regard for Ford’s part to the genre and pays ocular and/or narrative court toThe Seekersin three of his movies —Major Dundee,The Wild Bunch, andPat Garrett and Billy the Kid.And like Ford ( who, by the way, besides lived difficult like Peckinpah did ) , Peckinpah managed to animate great trueness from crew ( like his manager of picture taking, Lucien Ballard, and his composer, Jerry Fielding ) and histrions ( Ben Johnson – a favourite of Ford’s, by the way ; R.G. Armstrong, James Coburn ) , despite Peckinpah’s well-earned repute for being notoriously hard to work with. Ultimately, what tied them together was a profound similarity: “despite his bluster and butch posturing, Ford’s directing manner had a sensitiveness that allowed the audience to see more.” ( Raslan, 2006 ) . Despite Peckinpah’s alleged lecherousness for force, he excessively possessed this alone dichotomy.

Another influence for Peckinpah was John Huston, in peculiar his 1948 movieTreasure of the Sierra Madre. It is widely acknowledged that Peckinpah’s 1972 movieBring Me the Head of Alfredo Garciais a sarcastic re-imagining of Huston’s movie into an allegorical commentary on Peckinpah’s holding fallen out of favour amongst both movie critics and the power circles within mainstream Hollywood. Both movies involve the chase of illusive hoarded wealth at the beloved monetary value of personal hoarded wealth of existent religious or personal value, and though the court is partially a selfish and self-awarely violent one, Peckinpah’s love of Huston’s amazing filmmaking accomplishments and grasp of Huston’s love of male chumminess are apparent.

Sydney Pollack ‘sJeremiah Johnson

1972’sJeremiah Johnson, another in the pantheon of great Westerns, continues in the tradition of Peckinpah-type moral ambiguity/ anti-hero thematics, following the predicament of a apostate from the Mexican-American war who has had sufficiency of force and merely wants to settle down in the huge frontier of nature as a fur trapper. Unfortunately, he by chance desecrates a Native American entombment land and the folk kills his Native American married woman and adopted boy in requital, directing him on a blood feud of his ain against the folk.

There is a direct literary influence at work inJeremiah Johnsonin the strictest sense, i.e. the movie was based on a novel that was in bend based on an existent historical figure. In 1965, Vardis Fisher published the beginning novelMountain Man, which was inspired by a adult male named John Johnson who used to eat the livers of the Crow Indians whom he killed during his run of retaliation. Fisher was an reliable Westerner who was raised in Idaho in the early 1900s and he was a man’s adult male cut out of the same fabric as Hemingway, who in fact lived a few 100 stat mis off from Fisher at one point. ( To a immature fan, Mick McAllister – subsequently to go a author himself – who penned Fisher a missive inquiring to be pen buddies, Fisher responded gruffly, “Stop looking for fathers.” ) The novel was a violent yet Romantic jubilation of the original of the rugged individualist adult male ; it was besides the last in Fisher’s series of allegorical contemplations of the heartache and guilt he suffered over the self-destruction of his first married woman, Leona McMurtrey.Mountain Manrapidly became a critical success and attracted the attending of both Robert Redford, who signed on to play the lead function inJeremiah Johnson, and Sydney Pollack. ( The movie was the 2nd of seven filmic coactions by the two work forces. )

Jeremiah Johnsonwas a attractively blunt, hurting, and lyrical movie that evoked the contradictory arrested developments found within the plants of California poet Robinson Jeffers ( who died in 1962 ) , which lent itself absolutely to the kind of Western that Redford and Pollack wanted to do:

One of [ Jeffers’ ] favourite subjects was the intense, rugged beauty of the landscape in resistance to the degraded and introverted status of modern adult male. Strongly influenced by Nietzsche ‘s constructs of individuality, Jeffers believed that human existences had developed an crazily egoistic position of the universe, and felt passionately that we must larn to hold greater regard for the remainder of creative activity. ( Academy of American Poets, 1997 )

It would be derelict in discoursing the movie to exclude the political shadow that hung in darkness over the huge bulk of all American dad civilization during the clip in whichJeremiah Johnsonwas filmed and released: the Vietnam War. As it became clearer to the populace that the American armed forces was trying to utilize all its awful technological might to kill the Vietnamese countryside and its simple agricultural people in chase of supporting a selfish political, ideological abstraction, the American creative persons and intellectuals of the clip turned against the war ( Redford and Pollack being no exclusions ) , and their originative work reflected it. Merely as the Vietnam War was unpointed and unpopular and scarred the lives of ordinary work forces forced to make awful things to contend it, so was the Mexican War that prompts Jeremiah Johnson desert the American military and conflict his devils in a 20-year battle with the Crow Indians. And in so far as the movie is an oblique review of the haughtiness of the American doctrine of Manifest Destiny in the 1800s, it is besides a parallel review of the haughtiness and nearsightedness of America’s engagement in Vietnam, i.e. , what on Earth gave the United States the thought it had the right to kill the ecology and population of a countryside in chase of its sense of political and geographical entitlement?

Cinematic influences onJeremiah Johnsonsurely include the sweeping landscape-adoring filming of John Ford’s Westerns ; its geographic expedition of the revisionist Western original of the anti-hero owes a debt of gratitude to Sam Peckinpah’s movies. Besides, it is deserving observing thatJeremiah Johnson’s screenplay was co-written by John Milius, an honored genre author specialising in iconoclastic, politically wrong male characters, including his part to the Clint Eastwood authoritativeDirty Harry( 1971 ) , basically a Western fable set in the overly broad San Francisco of the late sixtiess. Last, Redford was non above a spot of self-reference:Jeremiah Johnsonterminals in a freeze-frame, which is a direct court to another of Redford’s authoritative movies, 1969’sButch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.

Tom Gries’Will Penny

Possibly more of a pure character survey within the confines of a Western than any of Peckinpah’s Western movies or Pollack’sJeremiah Johnson,Will Pennywas released in 1968 and stars Charlton Heston ( who besides starred inMajor Dundeefor Peckinpah ) . Heston’s character, an aging cowboy, lands a icky occupation as the 19Thursdaycentury equivalent of an underpaid security guard to guarantee homesteaders and intruders stay off his boss’ spread belongings. Unfortunately, he discovers a adult female and her immature kid crouching in the cabin assigned to him, and doesn’t have the bosom to kick them out. Soon — and possibly predictably — a love affair develops, though it is antique and patient in the manner it unfolds, ne’er even consummated, though the twosome does pull off to eventually steal a buss.

Will Pennycan be safely classified, with Peckinpah’s Westerns andJeremiah Johnson, in the class of a revisionist Western in the sense that it seeks to inspire the genre by researching or deconstructing one or more of its conventions in a different manner. Peckinpah was keenly interested in iconoclastic work forces out of synch with the times either because modern society had left them behind, or their utility had either elapsed or was ebbing off. Will Penny is merely such a adult male and it was a bold pick on the portion of Gries ( who besides wrote the book ) to research the softer side, if you will, of a cowpuncher – put on the lining the de-glamorization, on one manus, of one of the pillars of the genre, the larger than life, heroic, epic cowpuncher personified by characters played by John Wayne – while at the same time reenforcing one of the pillars of the genre, the heroic background of the Old West. Gries buttressed the latter by borrowing straight from Sam Peckinpah, using his beloved cameraman Lucien Ballard forWill Penny, and smartly confounded outlooks by projecting Charlton Heston as Will Penny – much as John Ford had utilized John Wayne as a tool to assist the Western genre Begin to research the anti-hero inThe Seekers. ( Peckinpah had cast Heston in the lead function inMajor Dundee. ) In projecting Heston ( and Ben Johnson, by the way ) and utilizing Ballard as his manager of picture taking, Gries was paying regard to the genre, but in nearing the portraiture of the cowpuncher icon by seeking to demythologise the hyperbolized original and state a more intimate, less action-oriented narrative, Gries was besides admiting the unfavorable judgment of the genre which had begun to stack up by 1968, including its prolongation of the impression of simple-minded American high quality. As such,Will Pennyacknowledged the of import relation of the Western and the cowpuncher to existent American history, but sought to demo that cowpunchers were non all gunslinging criminals who spent their yearss engaged in heroic escapades ; in most instances, in fact, the cowboy’s life was reasonably everyday and barely the material of glamor. As timeless movie critic Roger Ebert pointed out, “What we forget is that reasonably few people in the old West were engaged in striding down Main Street at high midday or hiting it out with Wyatt Earp.” ( Ebert, 1968. )

Will Pennybesides at the same time criticizes its predecessors by admiting the altering societal mores of the 1960s – within the context of the genre, the movie allowed for a displacement in the power balance between work forces and adult females. There is no demoiselle in hurt for Will Penny to deliver ; despite her black fortunes, the homesteader female parent encountered by Mr. Penny is no shriveling violet – she is an allegorical representation of a burgeoning feminism: “The liberated adult female of Will Penny is Joan Hackett – complete with a child and a murdered hubby. Her voice is one of concerned humanitarianism set against Heston ‘s macho, solipsistic position of life. To a certain grade, this semi-feminist figure replaces the patriarchal fixture of the feminine/wife, and frequently affects the modern male supporter with a broader position of his societal surroundings.” ( Brody, 1987 ) The fact that the movie is successful both as a love narrative and an reliable Western is a testament to Gries’ as a narrator and his regard for the genre and his cinematic predecessors.

Gries, Pollack, and Peckinpah wholly contributed immeasurably to the deconstruction and development of a genre which died by the mid 1970s, but the eternity of both their work and the Western itself became apparent in the 1990s with such movies asDances with WolfsandThe Unforgiven, both of which showed clear regard for and grounds of consciousness of their predecessors.

Bibliography

Winter, Craig. “Shoot to Commemorate: Sam Peckinpah Shoots from the Tragically Hip, ”Movias Cyberzine, July 1, 2000. Available from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.geocities.com/moVias/on8.html

Hagopian, Kevin. “The Seventh Samurai Film Notes, ” New York Writers’ Institute Film Notes Series, August 2001. Available from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.albany.edu/writers-inst/fns04n4.html

Dirks, Tim. “The Wild Bunch” , The Greatest Films, available from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.filmsite.org/wildb.html

Ramirez-Berg, Charles. “The Wild Bunch” ,Austin Chronicle,October 22, 1999 issue. Available in archive from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/1999-10-22/screens_feature5.html

Raslan, Kim. “Citizen Cam: Western Values, ”The Edge Daily Online.Available from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.theedgedaily.com/cms/content.jsp? id=com.tms.cms.article.Article_1fed1483-cb73c03a-c5577c00-c1bf3cc1

McAllister, Mick. “Vardis Fisher: The Real Idaho Writer, Mountain Man”At Wanderer ‘s Well.Available from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.dancingbadger.com/4fisher.htm #

Ebert, Rogert. “Will Penny, ”Chicago Sun-Times, June 5, 1968. Available in archive from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article? AID=/19680605/REVIEWS/806050301/1023 –

Brody, Phillip. “Rewritten Westerns: Rewired Westerns, ”StuffingMagazine Volume 1, 1987. Available in archive from:

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.philipbrophy.com/projects/rstff/RewrittenWesterns_C.html

Seydor, Paul.Peckinpah: The Western Movies: A Reconsideration.University of Illinois Press, 1997.

Weddle, David.If They Move, Kill ‘Em: The Life and Times of Sam Peckinpah.Grove Press, 2001.