With reference to psychological research evidence,

Jessica Wheelhouse

With mention to psychological research grounds, assess the impression that development occurs in phases

Historically, psychologists have speculated at length about the nature of human development. Development can be thought of as the alterations that occur as persons learn and respond to their environment and it incorporates all spheres of behavior – physical, cognitive, emotional and societal. Much of the work carried out by developmental psychologists centres around the impression that worlds develop through a series of developmental phases. This paper examines how the most outstanding classical theories of development attempted to explicate the nature of behavior and so looks at how these theories are being used to inform modern-day surveies of the nature and effects of human development.

Classical theories of development have, for the most portion, attempted to explicate human development in footings of phases by which worlds develop from babyhood through to adulthood. Much of the early work undertaken was criticised because it was limited to instance survey and experimental analysis, oftentimes anecdotal [ 1 ] . However, each of the theories presented herein have contributed to the manner in which human development is presently understood and the being of each attack provides an enlightening platform upon which new thoughts sing development can be presented.

One of the most outstanding of the early theories was proposed by Freud ( 1960 ) [ 2 ] who believed that development progresses through a series of maturationally determined phases get downing with the unwritten phase and come oning through the anal, phallic, latent and venereal phases [ 3 ] . Harmonizing to Freud, the sequence of phases is biologically determined, intending that each phase is fixed and that all persons develop through the same stage-like procedure. Freud insisted that human inherent aptitude is driven by unconditioned sexual thrusts and urges whereby behavior is derived from the motive to fulfill these thrusts, this he called the pleasance rule. Freud’s focal point was restricted to the development of the kid, which took topographic point before the age of five or six. Each of these phases incorporate the Oedipus composite and the baby begins life as an Idaho so through socialization, bit by bit develops an self-importance and so a superego [ 4 ] . In other words, Freud believed that the baby possessed merely the most crude elements of personality that demanded immediate satisfaction and the losing necessities of personality ( the self-importance and superego ) must be developed as the kid progresses through each phase of development.

Freud’s phase theory of development can be summarised chiefly as integrating two chief elements. First, Freud believed that maturity is determined entirely by the experiences of childhood and that development is concerned with the manner in which worlds cope with their urges in socially acceptable ways [ 5 ] . These basic premises have formed much of the activities that make up the footing of depth psychology today and hence contributed greatly to intervention modes for childhood and grownup mental upsets. The deduction is that upsets of the head are a manifestation of experiences and events that occur within the societal environment during childhood coercing the kid to develop defense mechanism mechanisms or to quash unfavorable experiences.

Following on from Freud, Erickson ( 1902-94 ) [ 6 ] agreed that the motive behind behavior was instinctual, cosmopolitan and that development occurred in a stage-like manner and proposed a psychosocial theory of development. Erickson revised and expanded Freud’s psychosexual theory, most notably, by suggesting that development was non sole to childhood and that it continued throughout the life span. Furthermore, Erickson placed greater accent on the influence of the societal universe on human behavior. He proposed ‘the eight phases of man’ whereby each phase builds on the completion of earlier phases. Erickson besides differed from Freud on the gradual development of the Idaho, self-importance and superego, keeping that all three elements of personality are built-in in worlds at all times. Each phase of development can merely happen if the person is biologically, psychologically and socially ready to travel from one phase to the following [ 7 ] . Harmonizing to Erickson, this involves a critical confrontation between the current ego and the demands imposed by the societal environment.

The psychosexual and psychosocial theory of development focused greatly on developmental alteration through phases that demanded struggle declaration, either between the ego and ego individuality ( psychosexual ) or the ego and external individuality ( psychosocial ) . In contrast, Piaget’s ( 1967 ) phase theory of development focused on cognitive operation and he proposed a four phase theoretical account of knowledge, the sensori-motor, pre-operational, concrete operational and formal operational phases. Piaget was concerned with how the kid reasoned and responded in its interactions with the environment and he maintained that worlds are predisposed with ‘a set of constructions increasingly constructed by uninterrupted interaction between the topic and the external world.’ [ 8 ] Piaget’s argued that development occurs through the demand to hold equilibration ( when the environment fits with bing scheme ) and that new experiences are understood through the procedure of scheme development by agencies of assimilation and adjustment. In other words, development alteration occurs when information from the environment forces the kid to develop antecedently bing scheme in order to understand world.

For the most portion, each of these theories has concentrated in defining the most appropriate phases of development in order to explicate developmental alterations in head and behavior. The undermentioned two theories shift somewhat off from this accent on phases and supply an alternate attack to understanding how development occurs in relation to the societal universe.

Evidence of Stages or is Development Continuous?

While Piaget placed a greater accent on the societal universe than did Freud, Vygotsky ( 1896-1934 ) [ 9 ] looked more towards the societal universe in developmental footings and highlighted the importance of linguistic communication on human developmental alteration, in add-on, emphasizing that this procedure must besides be seen in the context of the person’s civilization. Unlike Piaget, Vygotsky argued that kids could larn and develop from other people who are more knowing as opposed to being unable to larn new worlds merely when the kid is ready to come on through each phase of development. Vygotsky proposed that there is what he termed a zone of proximal development ( ZPD ) within which the kid is able to carry through, through larning from an expert, something he or she could non make holding non had adept direction [ 10 ] . The ZPD affords the kid the chance to develop through disputing pre-exisiting cognition. However, Zygotsky did cautiousness that such direction should be geared to the ZPD of the individual having the direction.

Yet another attack which focused more on the influence of the societal universe was that proposed by Bowlby ( 1969 ) which concerned the impact of relationships on an persons capacity to develop healthily [ 11 ] . Bowlby’s landmark work on the theory of fond regard was founded on the premiss that worlds have an innate desire to be loved by others. Bowlby believed that this desire develops from the infant’s early fond regard relationship with its primary health professional. In babyhood, the primary health professional is normally the female parent or the individual that is closest to the baby, passing the bulk of clip with her and who assumes duty for the infant’s safety and good being. Pulling on evolutionary theory, Bowlby reasoned that in order to last, the human baby relies on a unafraid fond regard relationship with its primary attention giver for its safety and good being. Attachments are formed through the interpersonal relationship that exists between the primary health professional and the baby. The type of fond regard that is formed is dependent upon the manner in which the primary health professional reacts and responds to the safety and good being of the baby. Primary caretakers that are antiphonal and supportive with their babies are able to instil a unafraid fond regard bond with the kid that is thought to supply the kid with openness to emotional experiences and a willingness to prosecute in originative and productive emotional ordinance. In contrast, irregular, inconsistent, unstable or unequal responses by the caretaker characterises insecure fond regards that produce maladaptive header mechanisms, low ego worth and an inability to efficaciously modulate emotional experience. Harmonizing to fond regard theory, fond regards formed in early babyhood continue to construct and beef up throughout childhood to go long permanent ways of developing and keeping relationships throughout the life rhythm. However, if attachment dealingss are maladaptive this can impede the developmental procedure and this can happen at any point throughout the lifetime.

Each of these theories has adopted a different attack and hence contributes to an apprehension of development in different ways. Freud focused chiefly on the declaration of impulse and self-identity while Erickson saw struggle between the ego and an individual’s external individuality. Piaget, in contrast, focussed more on cognitive ability and as a consequence has made the largest part to instruction. Vygotsky focussed less on behavior per Se and accordingly less on the impression of phases of development to concentrate on how the influences of the environment can increase the possible for development through linguistic communication and linguistics and Bowlby was more concerned with the influence of the societal environment on attachment relationships and how disorganized fond regards can impede development. Combined, these theories indicate that the impression that development occurs in phases, to a greater or lesser grade does look to reflect the manner in which human develop to some extent. However, it is clear that a stage-like theory of human development is non an wholly equal agencies by which to explicate the complexnesss of human behavior.

Discussion & A ; Conclusion

Erikson’s psychosocial theory was incorporated into a survey refering adolescent individuality formation and the influence of ill-treatment ( Pepin & A ; Banyard, 2006 ) [ 12 ] . It was hypothesised that persons abused as kids will exhibit more trouble in organizing individuality during the class of adolescence. Erickson’s theory backed up this hypothesis because he believed that life fortunes influence the formation of individuality during adolescence. Findingss revealed that societal support correlated with more successful development in immature grownups and they recommended separating between the different types of societal support in different environments in measuring development accomplishment.

An effort at finding the advancement of development was made by Geist & A ; Aldridge ( 2002 ) [ 13 ] in their probes of developmental differences in storytelling between really pre-school and younger and older primary school kids. The consequences showed that development varied as a map of age in much the same manner as Piaget proposed reflecting developmental related displacements in the manner in which kids perceive their societal universe. Pre-school kids fantasised within their narratives, compared to the more realistic fiction of younger primary school kids and older primary school kids were more likely to include personal narrations within their narrative relation. This survey provides grounds for the interaction between stage-like developmental accomplishments and the of import function that the environment has on developmental alteration. The differences between the kids narratives was likely to be partially due to preset developmental accomplishments in absorbing educational direction, nevertheless, it appeared that the developmental differences were being influenced non merely by the children’s predetermined developmental alterations but besides by their ability to interact with text and linguistic communication and the responses and reactions that their narratives received from their audience and their equals.

Finally, Schulenberg & A ; Maggs ( 2002 ) [ 14 ] propose a developmental-contextual position on development which emphasises multidimensional and multidirectional development across the life span. This position of development is different from those stated antecedently because it is founded upon the impression that worlds play the prevailing function in their ain development. Put merely, the basic premiss is that persons chose their societal environment based on their ain personalities, abilities, beliefs and ends.

The developmental-contextual attack is a major displacement off from the limitations of phase theories and pre-determined human behaviors to supplying a new avenue for analysis of the influence that human personality has on the manner in which behavior develops.

Wd: 1,940

Bowlby, J. ( 1969 )Attachment and Loss, Vol1: Attachment. Basic Books: New York

Eysenck, M. W. & A ; Keane, M. T. ( 2000 )Cognitive Psychology, a Student’s Handbook. Fourth Edition. Psychology Press Ltd. : United Kingdom

Freud. S. ( 1960 )The Ego and the Id ( The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud ). W. W. Norton & A ; Company Inc: New York

Geist, E. & A ; Aldridge, J. ( 2002 ) The Development Progression of Children’s Oral Story Inventions.Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29 ( 1 ) 33-39

Gleitman, H. , Fridlund, A. J. & A ; Reisberg, D. ( 1999 )Psychology. Fifth Edition. Norton & A ; Company: New York

Gross, R. ( 2005 )Psychology: The scientific discipline of head and behavior. Fifth Edition. Hodder Arnold: London

Heys, N. ( 1999 )A Student’s Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford University Press: New York

Howe, D. , Brandon, M. , Hinings, D. , & A ; Schofield, G. ( 1999 )Attachment Theory, Child Maltreatment, and Family Support: A Practice and Assessment Model. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey

Kenny, M. E. & A ; Sirin, S. R. ( 2006 ) Parental Attachment, Self-Worth and Depressive Symptoms among Emerging Adults.Journal of Counselling and Development,84 ( 1 ) , 61-72

Mash, E. J. & A ; Wolfe, D. A. ( 1999 )Abnormal Child Psychology. Brooks/Cole: London.

Pepin, E. N. & A ; Banyard, VL. L. ( 2006 ) Social Support: A Mediator between Child Maltreatment and Developmental Outcomes.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35 ( 4 ) , 617-128.

Schulenberg, J. E. ( 2002 ) A Developmental Perspective on Alcohol Use and Heavy Drinking during Adolescence and the Passage to Young Adulthood.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63 ( 2 ) , 54-61

Smith, P. K. , Cowie, H. & A ; Blades, M. ( 1999 )Understanding Children’s Development. Third Edition. Blackwell: Oxford

Whoolery, M. ( 2007 ) Are Children Morally Inferior to Adults?Journal of Comparative Poeticss, 27, 114-118