What do you understand by the footings ‘mainstream culture’ and ‘counter-culture’ in mention to the sixtiess? Discuss with mention to History and Religious Studies.
The Sixties were centrally about the acknowledgment, on the portion of an ever-growing figure of Americans, that the state in which they thought they lived – peaceful, generous, honorable – did non be and ne’er had.[ 1 ]
‘While Liberals have typically reacted to the 1960ss as an tremendous embarrassment, conservativists have used the period to great political consequence, deploying a version … that emphasizes upset, tolerance, and black every bit good as female assertiveness in such a manner that speed uping poorness, offense, drug usage, and even AIDS can be laid at the decade’s doorstep.’[ 2 ]
A popular apothegm, which may or may non be apocryphal, is that if you can retrieve the 1960s, you weren’t at that place. This is partially with mention to the counter-hegemonic drug civilization that had growing up with the decennary, a period of ‘free love’ experimental Rock music, burgeoning civil rights motions, and vernal emancipation from the compressing incommodiousnesss of parental control ; of the being of the perniciously lawless MAD magazine, the growing of overweening, apparently anti-liberal ‘federal’ authorities, and the asceticism of the immediate 1950s post-war old ages, surely in The US and ( in footings of emerging from the ashes and blood of World War Two with devastated economic systems ) Europe and many other parts of the universe. Besides, in footings of the radicalisation of the societal architecture that helps to specify a period,‘at their strongest, the motions of the Sixties amounted to an uncomplete Reformation. As in sixteenth-century Germany, the pressing immature, disgusted by the corruptness of values, round on the doors of established power in the name of reform.’[ 3 ] This work will open up these issues for treatment, and will consequently set about to research the impression of reform in the context of an overtly 1960s socio-cultural position, and will pull on pertinent historical and spiritual observations in order to offer a balanced appraisal of the importance of these constructs for the period in inquiry. First, though, it is of import to depict what we mean by ‘culture’ here, whether mainstream – ‘orthodox’ , ‘consensual’ , or ‘majority-based’ – or the obverse discrepancy, a counter-reaction to accepted mainstream thought. The over-riding consideration is that it is a ‘shared’ , even generic phenomenon, one with a capacity to universally symbolize, and one that is experienced on a pan-social degree. [ 4 ]
When cultural historiographers and others attempt to discourse and specify a peculiar period, like ‘the Sixties’ , one can non neatly get down on the first of January, 1960, and get down with a completely clean sheet ; history does non impart itself readily to neat, clear, cut-and-dry descriptions of an era. Social motions, wars, cultural events, political relations ands a host of other subjects must accept that there is an obvious and axiomatic blurring – a ‘morphing’ – of human experience that defies chronological parametric quantities and spans decennaries and in some cases centuries, and for illustration in the instance of the major universe faiths, even Millennia. Hobsbawm besides recognised this evident riddle by entitling the 4th and concluding portion of his seminal historical work,The Age of Extremes: the Short Twentieth Century 1914-1991.Equally much as anything else, Hobsbawm did this in full credence of the belief that the Twentieth Century as an look did non, surely for his intents, Begin in 1900, or so in 1901, but finally commenced with the oncoming of large-scale industrial warfare, and the accompanying, unprecedented mass slaughter, of World War One.
So it is with this essay ; the universe did non alter literally nightlong ‘twixt the 1950s and 1960s, nor did many of the affairs to be investigated here. Sometimes, thoughts that originated in another decennary or century merely come to light old ages subsequently, for illustration Gramsci’s theoretical geographic expeditions of ideological or cultural hegemony. [ 5 ] This ‘enlightenment’ besides underpins what Ashbolt specifically refers to as‘ … 1960ss excess – in peculiar, debauched values that undermined the bedrocks of faith, household, and community.’[ 6 ] Furthermore, as George and Starr observe, the likes of 1960s icons Ginsberg and Kerouac started to cut their counter-cultural dentitions in the extremist hotbed of San Francisco of the fiftiess. [ 7 ]
Originating from the unshackling from conventional personal consciousness, the 1960s, whilst possibly capable to hyperbole by some sing their cultural significance, however continue to vibrate, in that
‘The alterations of the sixtiess reflected non merely long-established broad causes, but besides a more specific rejection of conventional and cultural premises. In portion, this arose from a challenging of earlier norms that, in bend, was opposed to a recoil that was characterized by conventional morality and nationalism. Tension between the radicalism of the counter-culture and the recoil led to the culture-wars of the last half century.’[ 8 ]
Whether the ‘culture wars’ of the sixtiess were, so, seismal in nature is a moot point depending on whom one asks, but clearly they can non be ignored. Haight-Ashbury, for illustration, obviously provided a important counter-cultural guidepost with the outgrowth of a ‘hippie’ civilization that explicitly and noisily rejected mainstream political look and organised State-sponsored force with its attach toing militaristic flag waving as background to a catastrophic Vietnam War ( and the subsequent ‘Syndrome’ ) that had steadily imprinted its dark shadow on the American, [ 9 ] and so planetary mind.
Around the universe and most certainly in the Western, free-market, Democratic theoretical account, what happened in the US frequently followed elsewhere, which is certainly the instance with the ‘60s phenomenon ; [ 10 ] Western mainstream civilization was a mostly generic matter, based on English as the exportedLingua Francanormally manifested in a battalion of socio-political signifiers, and artistic manners. ( What has frequently been pejoratively described as American ‘cultural imperialism’ . ) Interestingly, Second-Wave Feminism besides re-discovered another signifier of counter-cultural emancipation, supplying a recoil against the sensed Establishment sexism and sexual bondage symbolised by the Miss World competition, a fetishistic jubilation of male hegemony and phallocentric triumphalism that turned out to be anathema to the adult females who denounced this signifier of subservience, burned their bandeaus, and demanded what this text refers to as the logic of equality. [ 11 ] In some ways, the battles of adult females for freedom closely mirrored theparturienciesof black work forces and adult females to gain some signifier of equality in societies constructed by, and for, the white bulk. Whilst the dockets of white adult females of scruples and dirt-poor, downtrodden black people might hold differed in graduated table and extent ( the outgrowth of ‘Black Power’ for illustration ) , the subterranean aims, nevertheless, may be viewed as convergent.
That advancement in the sexual and racial spheres, albeit arraigned against forces that may look to hold been immune to alter continued, is a given ; the country of work, for illustration, may be used as an accurate barometer of gender equality development. In 1938, Gallup asked the inquiry:‘Do you approve or disapprove of a married adult female gaining money … if she has a hubby capable of back uping her? ’The tendency has steadily increased twelvemonth on twelvemonth from 20 % of blessing, to 80 % by the terminal of the 1990s, and that from a Feminist position, the gait of the civilization wars‘erupted during the sixtiess and 1970s and quietened down afterwards.’[ 12 ]
Feminists, it may be noted, had to postulate with challenges on a figure of foreparts, non least of which was the affair of organized faith and its impact on the debatably ‘revolutionary’ skin color of the sixtiess. The sexual turbulences, the emancipating preventive pill, war, abortion, race and anti-war public violences, and the indignation of the ‘moral majority’ all conspired to show a mixture of hedonic wantonness that horrified mainstream democracy, and threatened to assume the established order of which consensual faith was, and remains, an built-in facet, as in:‘Church and State relationships are, as in the instance of other national institutional constructions, the merchandises both of historical traditions and of witting, rationally planned, and democratically legitimised Statecraft.’[ 13 ]
The battle sing the separation of church and State had a distinguishable length of service, and is one with no evident terminal in sight should one want to contemplate the post-Millennial neo-conservatives and their Christian fundamentalist outriders. In the Land of the Free, it is noted that‘ … most Americans had a spiritual association … and the taking faith was Christianity.’[ 14 ] However, it should be remembered that Christianity, whilst an essentialist monotheistic religion, however has many discrepancies dependent on who’s reading of the Bible one adheres to. Even within a particularist Christian split one may happen sub-divisions – ‘para-churches’ , if you will – that find their gestations in the mid 1960s, partially but non wholly in response of what they saw as by illation the revolutionist, baneful ( and, presumptively counter-cultural ) political Left, [ 15 ] and non burying Timothy Leary’s psychedelic ‘new religion’ that exhorted people to ‘turn on, melody in, and bead out’ [ 16 ] to the implied strains of lawless stone music, and fuelled by marihuana and lysergic acid, which, in a sense, besides approximates to the ‘sense of wonder’ that is‘formalized in the world’s religions.’[ 17 ]
Whether Leary intended it or non, his dictums on faith and personal freedom doubtless opened up the societal argument on affairs like State control and the function of formal, organized faith within such discourses. Geting in touch with one’s ‘inner self’ , in itself an act of personal spiritualty, suggested an about insouciant forsaking of mainstream religion in the hunt for intending that the established theoretical account was apparently unable to supply. So, the morning of the ‘Age of Aquarius’ seemed to implicitly reject mainstream spiritual tenet and to put the psyche with an alternate vision of spiritualty that offered the belief that‘ .. humanity is poised on the threshold of a monolithic alteration in consciousness, a return, in short, to the Golden Age.’[ 18 ]
Whether this died with Manson, the seductive temptingness of consumer corporatism, the Vietnam War and its changeless, ongoing miasmic consequence on US policy-making at place and projected abroad as an facet of the US Imperium, and in broader societal footings re-aligned the so emerging neo-conservative docket with respect to, for illustration, abortion rights for adult females [ 19 ] . So, treatment of a censorious mentality by the religious-political elite, or simply aggregate disenchantment on the portion of the counter-cultural New Left, is non the point for the intents of this essay ; suffice it to province that the eclipsing of the Sixties as societal phenomenon is fact, and that the State-Judeo-Christian building is still in topographic point. It may be that the ‘new’ irregular religions and motions were but a manifestation of a wider socio-cultural circumstance, one that has run its class and, in entire, most facets were confined to the ashcan of history. However, and given the oft-anarchic skin color of the Sixties, the ideals and political relations enshrined in the period were victims of their ain evident inability to organize efficaciously, and were therefore impotent in the challenge to the mainstream ‘power elites’ . [ 20 ] Besides, and every bit alluded to earlier, there remains an inextricable nexus between the construct of the State and organised faith ; hence, to dispute the authorization of one is to take on the complete bundle.
In the concluding analysis, the putative counter-cultural Reformation, such as it was, provided an interesting and originative era that finally failed to populate up to it exalted idealisms, and was later subsumed into Fordist consumerism as the tie-dye coevals abandoned their jean and beads for suits and the Sunday joint. Anarchic hedonism and anti-institionalism is all right in some state of affairss, but when pitted against the vested involvements of Mainstream Religion, Inc. , and ubiquitous Establishment domination, the result may good hold been normative.
Ashbolt, A. ‘Hegemony and the Sixtiess: Observations, Polemics, Meanderings.’ in:Rethinking Marxism.19, 2, April 2007.
Black, J. 2006.Altered States: America Since the Sixties.London: Reaktion Books.
Braunstein, P. and M. Doyle ( explosive detection systems. ) 2002.Imagine State: the American Counterculture of the sixtiess and ‘70s.London: Routledge.
Bromell, N. 2000.Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the sixtiess.London: University of Chicago Press.
Echols, A. 2002.Rickety Land: the Sixties and its Aftershocks.New York: Columbia University Press.
Enyedi, Z. ‘Conclusion: Emerging Issues in the Study of Church-State Relations.’ in:West European Politicss.26, 1, January 2003.
Ferraro, G. 2005.Cultural Anthropology: an Applied Perspective.6Thursday. erectile dysfunction. London: Wadsworth.
Fischer, C. and M. Hout. 2006.Century of Difference.New York: Russell Sage.
George, P. and J. Starr. ‘Beat Politicss: New Left and Hippie Beginnings in the Postwar Counterculture.’ in: Starr, J. ( ed. ) 1985.Cultural Politicss: Extremist Motions in Modern History.New York: Praeger.
Gitlin, T. 1993.The Sixties: Old ages of Hope, Days of Rage.New York: Bantam.
Greer, G. 1970.The Female Eunuch.London: Granada.
Hunter, J. 1991.Culture Wars.New York: Basic Books.
Lachman, G. 2001.Turn Off Your Mind: the Mystic Sixties and the Dark Side of the Age of Aquarius.London: Sidgwick and Jackson.