What are the main issues of debate now surrounding

What are the chief issues of argument now environing the inquiry of paying reparations toAfricafor the Transatlantic Slave Trade ( 1500-1800 ) ?

Although there have been calls for some sort of fiscal wage bundle for Africa of all time since the procedure of decolonization of the continent began in the 1950s, the inquiry of how to turn to the three hundred twelvemonth long transatlantic slave trade is one that does non shack within an economic context. Rather, the issue is centred within the kingdom of moral administration and the current broad democracy context that characterises the West. In this manner it should be noted that, “grounds for the claims for reparations are fundamentally moral issues” ( Kweku Asare, 2006:87 ) . It is accordingly located in the argument on human rights and the cosmopolitan autonomy of all people – a phrase that became progressively common after the terminal of the Second World War, making its zenith in the concluding decennary of the 20th century as the United States and Europe began to step in in human rights maltreatments taking topographic point abroad ( such as in Kosovo ) , cabling a new stage in international political relations. Indeed, Article 4 of the United Nation’s Universal Declaration on Human Rights declares that, “no one shall be held in bondage or in servitude ; bondage and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.” ( O’Byrne, 2003:263 )

This is an of import point and one that ought to be borne in head throughout the balance of the treatment. If states such as Great Britain and the United States of America continue to utilize the happening of human rights maltreatments in order to step in in the autonomous province administration of developing states around the Earth, so they must do certain that their ain actions and their ain histories are suited and compatible to these human rights purposes. Therefore, merely now at the present clip could a argument over allocating incrimination with respects to the combative issue of slavery take topographic point doing it a really modern-day concern.

This, of class, is non to province that the construct of reparations in international dealingss does non hold an obvious case in point. In modern historical footings, the impression of reparations was foremost cemented at the Treaty of Versailles in 1918 when Germany was deemed by the winning Allies as holding been responsible for the eruption ( and, therefore, the subsequent agony ) of the First World War. Via Article 231 – the so?called “war guilt clause” – Versailles represented a important milepost as it foremost established the thought that a province could be economically responsible for a human calamity. In this manner human life was seen as holding a monetary value. Furthermore, this monetary value was seen as being an built-in portion of the drawn-out procedure of Reconstruction for the peoples who have been most affected by the human calamity in inquiry.

This would therefore seem to demo a clear case in point of the West holding successfully implemented a policy of economic reparations on a guilty party at the decision of a struggle. The instance of the transatlantic slave trade is, arguably, similar to the instance of Germany after 1918 in so much as the guilt is non in difference and that the West itself had foremost trialled this thought of reparations merely shy of ninety old ages ago. Versailles would therefore look to be a factor working in favor of those who champion the West paying reparations to Africa for the portion they played in the prolongation of the slave trade.

However, rubing beneath the facade we see that the modern-day issue of reparations to Africa is in fact hampered by Versailles. Not merely was the pact cited by Hitler as the main ground behind his rise to power ( due to the crippling and demeaning nature of reparations ) but it besides failed to adequately turn to the issue of blameworthiness. Basically, those Germans that had made the determination to travel to war and to so contend the war were mostly either dead or had gone into expatriate. In this manner, it was guiltless Germans who paid the economic monetary value for the military slaughter of the war. The same is true of the slave trade today whereby the main supporters in the play have long since died. To bring down reparations on states such as Portugal, Britain and America would be to reprobate the people who today live in those states to guilt over the offenses committed by predecessors who have small or no cultural, national or historical connexion to them. Not merely is this entirely impracticable it is besides unfair and does non get down to turn to the issue of the transatlantic slave trade and why it was allowed to boom in the manner that it did for as many old ages as it did.

To to the full turn to the issue of how the transatlantic slave trade was able to boom for every bit long as it did would necessitate a sort of historical Inquisition that would be really complex for the African provinces who seek reparations from Europe and North America to confront up to. This is because of the important portion played by the Africans themselves in the slave trade, peculiarly in rounding up prospective slaves deep within the heartland of the continent. As Zinn ( 2003:25-30 ) attests from first manus docudrama beginnings, without the cardinal function played by the Africans, the Europeans and so the North Americans could ne’er hold profited from the slave trade in the manner that they did. There would surely non hold been adequate slaves to dwell and reap the Deep South of America. Thus, the issue of reparations is clouded by the being of guilt on the portion of the peoples claiming reparations in the first topographic point. This is an highly awkward moral, philosophical and legal riddle to confront – 1 that has few if any immediate replies.

Added to this confusion over guilt is besides the extent to which reparations has become an entirely ‘white’ issue. The job of blameworthiness on the portion of the Africans is testimony to the manner in which race has become the cardinal issue at work in the broader argument over reparations. This association is in itself non hard to understand, As Bulmer and Solomos declare, “in the political economic system of racism, societal scientists have argued extensively about the comparative importance of race and category as underpinning the development of black slaves” ( Bulmer and Solomos, 1999:58 ) . Yet acknowledging that black people have been the topic of bondage besides demands admiting that white people were non the lone people to hold partaken in the gaining control and trade of African work forces, adult females and kids between 1500 and 1800. It is good documented that Arab Muslims every bit good as white Christians were responsible for the prolongation of the slave trade. Indeed, although there was intense competition between the Islamic and the European slave trades, “the two webs were portion of the same enlargement of slavery” ( Lovejoy, 2000:233 ) . Therefore, bear downing modern twenty-four hours Europeans and Americans with reparations over the being of the transatlantic slave trade leaves the full procedure unfastened to accusals of historical technology as the critical portion played by both the Africans and the Arabs is overlooked in favor of following a clearly nonreversible position of universe history where merely whites in the developed universe are fit to confront the effects of offenses committed long ago.


It can be seen that the issue of bondage airss alone and complex jobs for all parties concerned. The greatest beginning of trouble for make up one’s minding whether or non reparations is the best class of action is in turn uping a suited precursor for such a payment of historical debt. Versailles proves that the economic sciences of reparations is hard to enforce in pattern as the guilt, where it can be provably proved, is non corporate. Even the issue of reparations to Jews after the Holocaust does non impact upon slavery reparations as the Jews were killed on racial evidences by culprits of a different credo and religion while slaves were sold by white, black and Arabic culprits, therefore rendering any comparing between the two obsolete.

In add-on, if the West was to pay reparations to Africans for the being of the transatlantic slave trade it would so trip a argument about reparations over, for case, sexual bondage so that the ascendants of adult females who were sold as sexual slaves could claim the same sort of recompense for the offenses committed long ago against their people. On the other manus, inactivity does look a feasible path if rapprochement between the West and Africa is to last. Therefore, in the concluding analysis, it seems safe to reason that some sort of wage bundle will be delivered by the authoritiess of Europe and the United States to Africa in the coming old ages although it is likely that this will be administered under the broader umbrella of ‘economic aid’ so as non to allocate fault to people for offenses committed ( in some cases ) over four hundred old ages ago by people with small or no cultural connexion to the populations of modern twenty-four hours Europe and North America today.


Bulmer, M. and Solomos, J. ( Eds. )RacismOxford: Oxford University Press

Kweku Asare, W. ( 2006 )Slavery Reparations in PerspectiveOxford: Trafford Publication

Lovejoy, P.E. et Al ( 2000 )Transformations in Slavery: a History of Slavery in AfricaCambridge: Cambridge University Press

O’Byrne, D. ( 2003 )Human Rights: An IntroductionLondon: Longman

Zinn, H. ( 2003 )A People’s History of theUnited States, 1492-present: Third EditionLondon: Longman